Consciousness and the
Higgs Boson
I
swiped most of this blog from Michael McCray and Daniel in their conversation
#54 with the Avonal Magistrate Son of God, Monjoronson. First I have to define
the fundamental principles or schematic that they are discussing:
SUSTAINABILITY=
QUALITY OF LIFE+ GROWTH + EQUALITY.
This
formula guides the whole of creation. They are speaking about the relationship
between beliefs, expectations, and assumptions. When your beliefs do not
fulfill your expectations, you find yourself under the necessity of questioning
them. That questioning process is what reveals your false assumptions and
enables you to correct them.
I
admit that this stuff is tough going, but I would remind you that when the
going gets tough, the tough get going.
"MMc: Why is it
necessary for us to live out these assumptions?
MONJORONSON: It is
not. It is not necessary to develop the
assumptions; assumptions are an easy way for a society to operate where you can
go from San Francisco to Chicago and operate on the same assumptions;
you can navigate through the city and the society quite quickly. Yet, when you engage the processes of social
action and individual action, then the assumptions can cause tremendous
grievance, can cause many grievances in the lives of individuals. That is why in a complex society such as
yours it is timely to begin examining all assumptions and validating them as
real or not real, as supporting the society productively or not. Examining assumptions is a process too of
developing a homogeneous society, wherein there are subcultures and ethnic
groups as belief systems, which have their own way of believing that is
particularly peculiar to individuals, but yet there is the commonality among
these groups that allows your society to operate as a system successfully. What has happened is that through the decades
and centuries of a society as it develops, these assumptions between the
various groups become aggravated and there is a lack of commonality, and the
assumptions create separation between the groups. In a pluralistic society this is the
beginning of the end, where you will have animosities between groups, and you
will not know how to work with each other.
The extremes of this are presented to you in the news every day, between
the religious groups in the Middle East , who
are antagonistic to each other. They
have forgotten the reasons for their religion and their commonalities. This has developed when you see the movement
from religious beliefs to religious assumptions to political beliefs and
political assumptions, then violence will be in the streets before very long.
MMc: I see. You’ve given us a moral compass to examine
our beliefs and assumptions, but also to disclose those assumptions and beliefs
that we are not aware of?
Using the schematic for moral, ethical and social issues
MONJORONSON: Yes, as you
use the schematic—and the schematic can be used either as a schematic for
sustainability or the schematic for examination of moral and ethical and social
issues—both processes force the users to examine their assumptions when they
see that their beliefs are not being validated.
When beliefs are not supported by the three core values, then you must
examine why. And when you examine the
why of the beliefs not being supported, you must then dissect the beliefs into
subsets of assumptions, and it is within the assumptions that you will find the
reasons that these beliefs are not supported.
Beliefs, opinions, assumptions are all very, very closely related. To have a statement of belief written on a
wall that is supported by the three values is very clear evidence of its
validation, but then when you find differences between individuals who have the
same beliefs that are supported by those same values, then you must begin to
examine why. Why does Joe have a
difference—even though Joe believes in the same belief as Betty—why do these
two individuals have differences of opinion about this belief? And when you begin to personally examine and
interview these individuals, you will find that they have subsets of
assumptions under each of those belief systems, and these must be
examined.
And when the assumptions are
examined and checked against the three central core values of sustainability,
then you will find those which work and those which do not. You will further find that sometimes those
assumptions are the same, and that they are validated by the core values. Then you must examine and say, “Why?” Then you begin to look at expectations. So the process you will be using in the
schematic is that you will be bouncing between the beliefs and the expectations
and those will reveal the assumptions that are underneath. The ends—meaning the three values—they are
permanent; they are infallible, as are your behaviors. You behaviors may be in error, but they
exist, they are definite, they are measurable, they are historic. And so, it is the middle-ground between the
expectations and beliefs—either going from expectations to beliefs, or beliefs
to expectations—which will assist you in analyzing the differences that occur,
and in those differences, you will find your assumptions. This is a process for broad-minded
individuals who are seeking union, not separation. If you are seeking separation, then you will
have your set of assumptions that give you reason to be separate from other
people.
MMc: You have to
want it to work in order for it to work.
(Monjoronson: Exactly.)
I noticed in reading about
the moral compass and the examination of beliefs and assumptions, you said that
this would work with the proviso “if” you want it to work. But in religion, it may not always work.
In religion, the schematic may not always work
MONJORONSON: No. In religion you have definite beliefs that
have been written down by the originator of the belief system. The beliefs of the originator may not have
been validated against the three core values, so the religion is not exempt
from this examination, but it is what people believe because they want to believe
it. It supports their prejudices, their
own assumptions and beliefs. It is quite
easy for you to validate a religion as socially sustainable or not.
We have not brought this to
your attention before, as we did not want to make this a topic of finger
pointing and saying “we are right and you are wrong.” A person’s religious belief system is really
quite none of your business. If a person
wants to believe that way and call it a religion, then that is up to them. If you want to apply that to a society and to
other people who do not believe that way, then this is oppression. But your own personal beliefs within your
mind and your own personal lives are your business. When you project your religious belief systems
onto other people, that the others should believe the same way that you do,
that is oppressive. If you believe that
you are right and they are wrong, that is your opinion. To enforce that on others is contrary to
social sustainability. Do you understand
this qualification?
MMc: I understand
the qualification, but…
MONJORONSON: Let me
explain further. You, at this moment,
now, you have in your own mind an awareness that there are some religions which
are not socially sustainable, am I correct?
MMc: Yes. Certain ideas within religions are not
socially sustainable.
With religion, bring in integration, not separation
MONJORONSON: That is
exactly right. We are not in the process
of developing separation. We are in the
process of bringing integration, wholeness and oneness. It rests upon the individual to learn the
processes of social sustainability and determine whether they are applicable to
their own life. What we want to avoid
are individuals using the schematic for sustainability and the moral compass to
point their fingers to other people’s religions that are not socially
sustainable and saying that these individuals should be terminated or removed
from society, or the religion banned.
This is not a practical method.
Using the schematic to enforce your own political agendas is not within
the purview of God’s kingdom of light and love.
These radical agendas are apart from the schematic.
MMc: I think what
would be good is to re-examine this topic at a different time. Let me think about it a little bit. I can understand you don’t want to use the
schematic as a club. (Monjoronson: That is correct.) That makes sense to me. On the other hand, there are certain ideas
within certain religions that would benefit being examined by the schematic.
MONJORONSON: We do not
need to do that in this forum. Doing that
in this forum gives it authority and gives it authenticity and gives it
legitimacy, and we will not extend the legitimacy of this process, which seeks
to develop oneness, by giving its authority to individuals politically to
oppress others. We have been teaching
this to you now for several years, and it is only dawning upon some of you that
there are religions and political positions, which are not supported by this
social sustainability process or by the schematic. This is the first time we have spoken of
that, and we do not want to embellish individual’s minds into thinking that
they have a sword in their hands to right the wrongs of the world. We said a moment ago what people believe
religiously is their own business, between their own two ears. Therefore, you will find that by not speaking
of this, individuals will eventually see the elephant in the living room and
realize where we are going with this.
Where we are going with this is a world that lives and exists as
socially stable and is not tumultuous, but it is socially sustainable, and that
there is oneness in the cultures of the people, and that there is an
understanding of social sustainability as applicable to all ways of life, and
that people would voluntarily abandon non-socially sustainable values, beliefs
and assumptions and expectations.
MMc: I certainly
understand your position and I agree with it.
In looking at our various conversations over the time period that we’ve
been having them, I find that all too often, I’ve interrupted you in the midst
of your giving an answer, which is unfortunate on my part. I can’t say that it won’t happen again, but
it is unfortunate and I’ve collected some of these that you haven’t been able
to finish because I’ve interrupted you.
I would like to ask those questions again, if I may.
Can you give us some
examples of how a future, service-based society might work?
How might a future, service-based society work?
MONJORONSON: Yes. There is a pervasive culture-wide awareness
by individuals, communities and societies, organizations, corporations,
foundations, government agencies, that all decisions are made with
consideration of social sustainability, and that these are not separate; that
rather than departments of education, there is an educational system that is
composed of various agencies and influences that assist in the educational
process; that there is a oneness or wholeness to a society, and that one part
affects the all, and that they are not separate. What occurs in a society is diligent forethought
by individuals and executives and by boards, agencies, commissions, bureaus and
departments and so on, of the repercussions of their decisions and
actions.
You see this in many ways,
for example, with a highway department.
A highway department of a city or county or state—or Federal
Government—makes plans to rebuild a highway at such and such a date in the
future. They put out notices to the
electrical company, to the fiber-optic company, to the telephone company, to
the gas company, water company, sewage company as to these changes, and say,
“You will need to take this into account, and if you want to refurbish or
rebuild your utilities, now is the time to do that, because once we lay this
new road, we do not want you coming back and digging it up to make
repairs.”
Now, if you consider a local
healthcare clinic in the new era, they will be involved in education, they will
be involved in vector control—which has to do with mosquitoes, rats and disease
carriers as that—and many other aspects of healthcare, family planning, social
dynamics of the community and so on; that there will be many, many connections
in each system. You will begin to see a
society much like a brain, which if you were to examine each individual cell,
that it has tendrils radiating from the cell itself, making connections to all
other cells around it, 3-dimensionally.
This is what will be the main differentiating factor of the future of
this society, compared to your own. Does
this help?
MMc: Yes, it
does. And it is a very complete
answer. Should I ask you to further that
answer or can we decide that that is as good as we can get it at the
moment?
MONJORONSON: I will simply
give you a metaphor of the neural network as a system of neural
connections. In a society, you have a
neural social network of many connections, which is very similar. Each connection will operate as a whole
system so that there is mutual support between those systems and their
operation for the benefit of societies, social sustainability and the social
sustainability of individuals and families.
How does consciousness interact with universe energy?
MMc: I’ve been confused about the concept of
consciousness and how consciousness interacts with universe energy. I wondered if you might be able to help me
with that, getting those concepts straight?
MONJORONSON: Yes, I will strive to keep my answers brief
and leave room for you to ask adjusting or subsequent questions as you
need. Will that work for you?
MMc: Yes, it will.
Thank you.
MONJORONSON: The connection between consciousness and
universe energy, of course, is God. God
is of one mind; God is of one consciousness.
It would be inappropriate to call it the consciousness of God that
pervades all time and space of the universe, of the infinite 3-dimensional
universe, but for your use and [for] simplification, we will say it is. And so, the presence or consciousness of God
occupies all of space and time of the material universe, and uses consciousness
to place its imprint upon universe energy for the out-forming of the universe,
according to the Architects of Time in the universe and those unfolding
plans. This also allows consciousness
from other sentient beings, to manipulate universe energy as well. That the universe energy “wants to”—and that
it is inappropriate to give it that type of consciousness—be in alignment,
agreement, in harmony, in synchronicity with your intentions. Your intentions are expressed in your
consciousness. When you hold an
intention in mind, you are holding a pattern or plan in consciousness, and when
you express this to the universe as a desire or need, then the universe energy
is attracted to that intention to out-form your consciousness.
The interest of the universe
Administration, working with mortal beings who are imperfect, is to improve
their perfection voluntarily, so they choose to do God’s will, so their
intention and their consciousness assists the universe to bring the universe
into completion—one person, one thought, one intention at a time. Therefore, you have many people in agreement
in out-forming an intention in their consciousness, then that will surely come
into being. The concerted, coordinative
efforts—meaning efforts as intention—in the consciousness of many people, has a
powerful effect upon the collective consciousness of that world. You are now seeing that occurring on your
world where there is the concerted, coordinative efforts of thousands and
millions of individuals to bring about light and social evolution, peace and
harmony into your world. You are making
a difference. I have extended my answer
far past what you asked I believe, but let us go from here. Did I satisfy your original question?
MMc: Yes, it’s fascinating—the concept of
consciousness and how consciousness interacts with universe energy. It’s a fascinating topic because universe
energy obviously comes from the Father.
You began by talking about the concept of consciousness, also coming from
the Father—or at least the Father’s consciousness. I was interested in the consciousness of the
individual, as in myself and how it might interact with universe energy, but I
believe it’s a parallel, although my consciousness can’t interact at the same
level that the Father’s consciousness could on universe energy, there is a parallel
in my using my consciousness to act on universe energy, so that it is a step
down but certainly I have some effect on universe energy, a positive effect on
universe energy by using my consciousness.
MONJORONSON: Yes, just as the Father has given you
personality, God has given you an imprint of the faculty of consciousness to
yourself, so this is a part of God’s consciousness as you choose to align
yourself with God, you are able to…
[ This is Daniel:
Monjoronson is striving not to spin us into the ground here, getting
into a verbal conundrum which is incomprehensible to readers.]
This is Monjoronson: Let me put this plainly to you: Human consciousness, human mind has the
capacity to manipulate universe energy for dark and evil purposes, which the
universe and we do not participate in.
However, when you align your will, your consciousness and intention with
that of God’s then you have our support and the willing support of the universe
to assist you in out-forming that development of your intention. Therefore, good will come into being,
eventually.
Anomalous
developments of the mind
There are questions by your
scientists about what they call anomalous developments of the mind, where you
have E.S.P., where you have telepathy, where you have precognition of future
events, where there are these developments, but truly, these are not unusual,
simply because consciousness and personality are eternal and live outside the
parameters of time and dimensional space.
In other words, when you have serendipity and coincidence that is the
universe “shaking hands” with you in agreement with what you desire. You cannot call it the subconscious mind, as
it is not the subconscious mind, but your conscious, intentional mind is
bringing things into existence with the agreement of the universe. Your thinking is in harmony with the pattern
and order of universe energy, and therefore, you begin to see the unexpected
anomalous appearance of coincidence, serendipity and happenstance for your
benefit. Do you see the “Ah-ha” in that?
MMc: Do I see the “Ah-ha” in that?
MONJORONSON: The unexpected, “My gosh! Look at that and I didn’t even ask for it and
there it was!” When you see that
occurring, you must have in mind that what the son wills and the Father agrees
to, IS! You are no different than a
Creator Son, but to a much more limited degree.
And when you are in agreement, when you will something by your
intention, will it into existence and it is in agreement with the universe,
then it is a fait accompli. It is
done.
MMc: Our scientists talk about the quantum level
that the observer becomes a part of the experiment. The observer is able to change the outcome of
the experiment.
The
observer changes the outcome through consciousness
MONJORONSON: Yes, this has been demonstrated many times
over the last thirty to forty years.
This one has just finished a book called, “Extraordinary Knowing” by
Elizabeth Lloyd Mayer, Ph.D. Your scientists
have had examples where an individual sits in an isolated room with a computer
and the computer has an equal opportunity of making decisions for ones or
zeros, and these are recorded. The mind
of the individual, simply by sitting there, who chooses as the intention of
having more zeros than ones, will have an influence on the computer, so that in
the passage of ten million tests, there will be more of a majority of the zeros
than the ones. This is a direct,
observable, demonstrable demonstration of that quantum theory in application. Your minds are powerful; you have an
influence around you whether you are conscious of it or not, that is why it is
so important to have a positive attitude to understand these metaphysical
principles. These are tied to quantum
physics.
MMc: I have what I think is a personal question
about something you said in the past:
“Your conscious is very limited, though it is hugely expanded past the
capacity of most mortals to comprehend or to use effectively.” Were you speaking to me personally, about my
consciousness?
The
qualitative capacity for consciousness in mortals
MONJORONSON: Yes, we could say that it is you, but you are
very typical of most people. It is the
difference between quantitative and qualitative capacity. Your consciousness has quite a large
quantitative capacity to it, but qualitatively it is very, very limited and
diminished.
MMc: In the past you used the metaphor of our
being like a mail truck, moving around with many messages that were
inconsistent, saying that your intentions begin to organize your messages so
that when you travel, you deliver a consistent state of consciousness. I wondered if you would enlarge upon this
concept of a “consistent state of consciousness,” please.
Achieving
the Master Consciousness level
MONJORONSON: Yes, I would be glad to. Let me extend the metaphor further: Imagine that you are a UPS truck, and that
you carry messages and boxes. Some of
the boxes have electronics in them, some have foodstuffs, and so on. If you tried to analyze them simultaneously,
it would be quite confusing. But, if you
were driving a gasoline refueling truck with 10,000 gallons of unleaded
gasoline in it, it would be quite clear that there is only one huge “message”
being carried by this truck. When you
hold in your mind conflicting messages, then what comes back to you from the
universe will be confusing. When you
have the capacity of this tanker truck, for positive, constructive thinking,
then you will be receiving messages from the universe consistently. There is a sidebar to that: Just as the Dalai Lama and Mother Theresa are
what we would call “tanker trucks” of consciousness, they hold positivity in
mind; they are also bombarded and live in a world of tremendous conflict, but
they limit what comes into their consciousness, their awareness, that may have
an effect upon their intention. They
hold a consistent intention, a consistent message, whether they deal with
individuals or projects or ideas, concepts, books, or other material—they are
consistent. They know how to sort and
sift what comes to them so that they remain consistent and powerful. Simply being consistent makes them powerful,
because they are not vacillating or wavering in their opinions or thoughts, or
what they project to other people. Do
you understand?
MMc: Yes.
When I think of a consistent state of consciousness, I think of Jesus
and his state of consciousness. This
would be the ideal that I would search for, or that I would try to emulate.
MONJORONSON: Yes, this is often called the “Master
Consciousness,” that when you hold the Master Consciousness in your life, in
your mind and your consciousness for your whole being, then you are consistent,
and that you are not swayed by other people’s jeering comments or hostile,
venomous statements, that you know are simply not true, and so you are whole
and complete and unswervable, and that image from you is in agreement with the
highest Master Consciousness of anyone else.
Therefore, you are humbly powerful, and powerfully humble.
MMc: You said that when you see us, you see, feel
and know our consciousness and the depth of who we are and our uniqueness. Would you tell us a little bit more about how
you perceive us?
How
are we perceived by Monjoronson
MONJORONSON: Yes, I perceive you completely! I perceive where you came from. I perceive the roots of your parents and
grandparents. I see their influence in
you. I see your whole life and the
spectrum of your thoughts and your decisions and your actions. I see all that exists in you that has ever
been. I also see within you your life
plan, what you came here to do, what your mission is, so to speak. Some of you have destinies and some of you do
not—all of you have life plans to learn lessons, and after you learn them, you
can be of service, if you choose, and so your life plan unfolds. Yes, I see all of that, and nonetheless, I
love you; I care for you; I accept you and appreciate you as you are, for the
willingness in yourself to grow, the determination to grow, and I respect that
and we will do everything we can to assist you in that growth.
The
state of being powerful
MMc: Thank you.
I appreciate that. You said that
you see us as powerful. Few of us
recognize ourselves as powerful, but I understand that it can be very
beneficial to the individual and to the planet if we all were to hold that
opinion of ourselves in a positive way.
Would you comment of that?
MONJORONSON: Yes, I would be glad to. Most of you truly do not believe that you are
powerful, therefore you go around trying to express your power, your authority,
and your control over other people, to have lots of material wealth and so on,
as this is the external edifice of your powerfulness. But the truly powerful individual knows this
already and has no need for external expression to impress other people and to
reassure themselves against their weakness.
A truly strong person is of the Master Consciousness, and does not have
need to seek outside supports for their strength.
MMc: I agree.
I have a couple of trick questions, I hope.
MONJORONSON: Well, I will give those trick questions to
Sondjah, then. (Laughter.)
MMc: Monjoronson, scientists have discovered the
Higgs boson. What is the actual
significance of this discovery?
The
significance of the Higgs boson discovery
MONJORONSON: [This is Daniel again: (Laughing heartily.) He said,
“It was never lost.” I don’t know
if this is going to be productive or not.]
One moment.
The significance is far
larger than anyone has any imagination.
Some of your scientists have imagined part of what this discovery could
mean to your world, technologically. It
could mean that you could eventually devise instruments, technologies that
would nullify gravity, and not only nullify it, but you could use it to
accelerate against a gravitational force, that you could travel from earth to
the moon in minutes, rather than days.
The Higgs boson particle has a tremendous impact on every planet that
has ever discovered it and applied its uses.
Further, this will also inaugurate an era where there is no going back
to the ignorance of separation anymore between individuals and their planet,
that everyone is connected.
This takes the quantum
theory to a much more pragmatic level as far as consciousness is
concerned. In the long term, it means
that after a tremendous technological advance for your world, the human species
will become more highly evolved as will the spiritual, ethical, moral, social
development in your world also become highly evolved. This will take millennia to accomplish. It will require your scientists now to play
with this particle, to discern it further, to see how to influence it, see how
to bring it into existence more easily.
It will mean the unification of your physics theories into what they
call the “Grand Unified Theory.”
Unbeknownst to all of you is that this will also require you to bring
into existence in the future the Grand Unified Social and Spiritual Theories
where there is a oneness of being that is existential among all of you, rather
than between you.
MMc: I don’t know what to ask at this point,
except to thank you for your analysis and to tell you I had no idea.
MONJORONSON: Yes, that is quite common among everyone on
your planet concerning this particle, that no one really has any idea. They found it because they knew it existed as
an exception, that there was an incompletion in their theory. Now, they must start from the zero point and
begin developing a theory that incorporates this particle into the balance of
the universe, that it is not the exception they are finding, but now they have
the most evident part on which they must build.
This will be the most challenging part.
MMc: The last question for today’s session: On any given world is there only one divine
entity that appears as a babe?
MONJORONSON: No. [Daniel:
That’s all he’s going to say.]
MMc: No?
MONJORONSON: No, there can be more than one.
MMc: I see.
I want to thank you for your responses today. You have been very open with us and I want to
thank you for helping me in understanding some of these things much better than
I did coming in here.
MONJORONSON: Thank you.
Do not forget, however, that we are speaking about some extremely
complex issues, which will be most difficult for some readers to appreciate and
understand.
MMc: Thank you very much. Do you have anything that you would like to
say in closing here?
MONJORONSON: Yes.
Do not forget that you are God’s particles! God loves you. (Laughter.)
MMc: Thank you.
That brings a smile to my face."
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Signing off at Malbazar on Wednesday, July 18th,
2012 – John Robert
Thwaytes
No comments:
Post a Comment